All students within Herne Bay High School benefit from a minimum of a five-year journey with us, with many of our students choosing to stay on at school for another two years to study post-16 courses within, what OFSTED in June 2022 have assessed is an ‘outstanding’ 6th form, with these students then progressing onto universities or apprenticeships or into the world of work.
As such, our students’ educational journey, is split into three phases:
- Years 7, 8 & 9 - Key Stage 3 (our Lower School)
- Years 10 & 11 - Key Stage 4 (our Upper School)
- 6th form
Each of these phases are discrete educational journeys in themselves, however each phase lays down a students’ academic and personal foundations on which the next stage of their education is built. In other words, a student who excels in the Lower School will not automatically achieve excellent GCSE grades unless they remain fully dedicated to their studies in the Upper School and conversely a student who maybe did not necessarily excel within the Lower School can, with hard work and commitment, achieve outstanding GCSE and post 16 results and outperform their peers.
We recognise that all young people are different - some may be strong in literacy-based subjects such as English and the humanities, other students may be stronger in science or maths-based subjects, whereas other young people may excel in the arts.
When students join us in Year 7, they sit nationally developed ‘Cognitive Ability Tests (CATS)’, which will help us to understand their developed ability (i.e. where a child is now) and likely academic potential (i.e. where a child could be) for each of their subjects. These CATS indicate the likely progress of our students in each of the different subjects they study, as they compare the young person’s CATS’ results with thousands of other students nationally who have sat these tests and establish what the majority of students with a similar set of results achieved in each of their different exams.
This process is not exact, and some young people with similar CATS’ results will outperform their peers in assessments if they work hard and prepare well for their tests, whilst others may do less well if they don’t commit to their studies – as such, CATS are simply an indicator of likely progress and not an absolute guarantee of what a young person will achieve in their exams.
In our Lower School we use these CATS results to establish the expected progress that our students should be able to achieve. As such three times a year, in November, February and June, Lower School students will sit assessments and following each of these assessment windows parents/carers will receive a ‘Progress Report’.
These Progress Reports will indicate what percentage mark their child achieved in each of their assessments and, for each of the subjects that their child studies, whether their child’s progress is:
- in line with what is expected of them – in such cases the student will be given a Progress Indicator of a ‘P’ for that subject
- is above that which is expected of a student with a similar CATS starting point, if this is the case the student will be given a Progress Indicator of a ‘P+’
- is below where they should be, if this is the case the student will be given a Progress Indicator of a ‘P-‘
Please see the illustration below for a possible outcome of this:
Mrs Brown has twins (Jane and John) in Year 8 at Herne Bay High School, and both Jane and John sat their CATS in Year 7.
- The children’s CATS results indicate that Jane, as long as she works very hard and maintains an excellent approach to her studies, is likely to outperform John in physics and maths, whereas John is deemed likely to outperform Jane in English.
- Mrs Brown recognises that CATS are only an indicator of likely progress, and as such she recognises that either of her two children can achieve fantastically high results with hard work and dedication.
- Both Jane and John sit their November assessments and the results are as follows:
On first glance, the children’s CATS results are indeed accurate, Jane has outperformed John in physics and maths, whereas John has outperformed Jane in English. However, when Mrs Brown receives the children’s Progress Report, it looks like this:
So to explain:
- Physics
- Jane achieved 67% in her physics exam, this is in line with her expected progress and hence the fact that she receives a ‘P’ for physics.
- John achieved 59% for his physics exam, this is 8% less than Jane’s result, but he has been allocated a ‘P+’ Progress Indicator - this is because John’s CATS results indicate that he has outperformed other similar students in this physics’ assessment.
- Maths
- Jane’s 63% for maths is better than John’s 56% maths result, however she has received a Progress Indicator of a ‘P-‘ and John has received a ‘P+’. This is because Jane has achieved a maths result that is below that of students with a similar aptitude for maths as identified by her CATS results, whereas John has outperformed similar ability students to himself.
- English
- Jane has received a Progress Indicator of a ‘P+’, having achieved 62% in her English assessment, whereas John achieved 71% in his English assessment and has been given a ‘P’ Progress Indicator. This is because Jane’s English mark is higher than students with a similar CATS predictor for English, whereas John’s English percentage mark is in line with other students with a similar English CATS predictor.
As is evident, the Progress Indicator (P- P, P+) that a student receives for each subject is personalised to individual students and considers how students perform in their assessments in comparison with other students of a similar ability.
This Progress Indicator approach to monitoring students’ progress will mean that a young person who, through their CATS results, has demonstrated that they are one of the most able students in, say, geography and who subsequently gets an extremely high percentage mark in their geography assessment, may only receive a Progress Indicator of a ‘P’ not a ‘P+’ in their Progress Report, as, although they have achieved a great result in their assessment which may be one of the highest marks in the year, their result is in line with their expected progress, as such this student should not be downhearted that they haven’t received a ‘P+’, but rather immensely proud of their achievement as they are maintaining an excellent approach to their studies and remain one of the highest performing students in their year with regard to geography.
On the other hand, a young person whose CATS results suggest that they may not perform quite as well in geography as they may perform in some of their other subjects, may achieve a Progress Indicator of a ‘P+’ for achieving a much lower percentage mark than the high ability geography student above, and this will be because they have outperformed other students of a similar ability, with this being something to celebrate.
For some of our subjects, their curriculum does not have assessment at punctuated points and their assessment framework is ongoing and developmental. Also, for some subjects an assessment, test or exam is not a suitable method to ascertain if a student is doing well in this subject as they are made up of various interconnected parts which are harder to measure. Subjects such as Art and PE are examples of these. Therefore, depending on these subjects’ curriculum, some subjects will give a “P” indicator but instead of this referring to progress, it will refer to the students holistic’ progress in their journey on this subject. Due to the nature of these subjects, we understand that there is holistic judgement to be made on areas such as resilience, character, problem solving and teamwork that are important for a student to be successful. There also may be more fluctuation in how well they are progressing depending on what they are doing. For example, in PE a student may excel at gymnastics but may not have an aptitude for other sports due to certain physical characteristics or experiences. Likewise, for example in Art, they would consider their reflection. evaluation and visual risk, alongside the development of their artwork. All these Foundation subjects will give a dedication indicator of ‘Excellent’, ‘Good’, ‘Inconsistent’ and ‘Poor.
At Herne Bay High School, we use Accelerated Reader, a programme that allows us to track student’s progress in Reading. Students are set targets using the results from the Star Reading Test, taken four times a year. It measures reading speed, comprehension, recall and understanding of vocabulary. Using this data, the programme sets an achievable reading target for every student, which is renewed every two terms (three times a year).
To achieve their target, students must read a book within their reading range for 20 minutes every day (Monday to Friday), and quiz on every book they finish within 24 hours. Students that engage with this fully will achieve 100% of their target every two terms.
- The student is on track to reach 100% of their target by the end of term. They have been reading for 20 minutes every day and quizzing on their books when they have finished them. They are making good progress in their reading and will be given a ‘P’ indicator
- The student is on track to reach above 100% of their target by the end of term. They have been reading for more than 20 minutes every day and quizzing on their books when they have finished them. They are making excellent progress in their reading and will be given a ‘P+’ indicator.
- The student is not on track to reach 100% of their target by the end of term. They have either not been reading for 20 minutes every day or not quizzing on their books when they have finished them. They are making below expected progress in their reading and will begiven a ‘P-‘ indicator.
To conclude. after each assessment, students will have the opportunity to review how they are doing and will look at areas within each subject area that they know, can remember, and can do, whilst also considering areas that need improving. This is a really important aspect of the learning process as students can identify what and how to make progress.